Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0500 14
Original file (NR0500 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490

 

BAN
Docket No.NROGO500-14
5 dune 2014

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records

-To: Secretary of the Navy
Sj: AAA

Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser 813/102 of
3 Apr 2014
(3) Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the
applicable naval record be corrected to show that she advanced to
E-4/1T3 from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement exam.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsailman, Ruskin and George,
reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on

28 May 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
partial corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
availabie evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the
Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies.

3, The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s
application has commented to the effect that Petitioner’s request
warrants partial relief as described below.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds
Docket No.NROO500-14

the existence of an injustice warranting the following partial
corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate, as
follows:

a. Petitioner was advanced from the March 2013 Navy-wide
advancement exam with an effective date of 16 September 2013 and a
Time In:-Rate date of 1 July 2013.

Note: The change in the effective date of advancement to BE-4 may also
impact on Petitioner's E-5 advancement opportunity. If Petitioner was
eligible for, but did not take an E-5 examination because the above
change had not yet been made, the following procedures will apply to
remediate that missed opportunity. Petitioner should take the next:
available E-5 advancement examination and compare the Final Multiple
Score (FMS) received on that examination with the FMS that was
required for the “missed” examination. If the score received mects or
exceeds the score that was previously required for advancement,
Petitioner may reapply to this Board for consideration of advancement
to E-5 retroactive to the date Petitioner would have been advanced on
the “missed” examination cycle. A DD Form 149, a command

endorsement /recommendation, and a copy of this letter must be included
with the request. The Board will @etermine whether the request will
be approved.

b. That so much of Petitioner's request for corrective action as
exceeds the foregoing be denied for the following reason.

c. A copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner’s
naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6{c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 723.6(¢c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the
Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitied
matter.

 
  

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN BRONTE I. MONTGOME
Recorder Acting Recorder

5. ° Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6 (@)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured

2
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), bas been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the

Navy.

5 June 2014 ee te Sy FRes

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3376 14

    Original file (NR3376 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser 811/085 of 13 Mar 2014 1, Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-4/AT3 from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2940 14

    Original file (NR2940 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-4/AT3 from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 7 April 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5654 14

    Original file (NR5654 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that petitioner wag advanced to E-4 from the February 2013 Navy-wide advancement 2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zealman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 9 June 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1089 14

    Original file (NR1089 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 8. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a} Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-4/EN3 from the March 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 14 April 2014 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR882 14

    Original file (NR882 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed | enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to B-4/¥YN3 from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 April 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0167 14

    Original file (NR0167 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 5S. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/HM2 from the March 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 7 April 2014 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9678 14

    Original file (NR9678 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner advanced to E-6/AWOl from the March 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Ms. Countryman, Mr. Bey, and Mr. Koman reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on , 19 November 2014 and, pursuant to its reguiations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5315 14

    Original file (NR5315 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7071S. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to grade his March .2014 Navy-wide advancement exam to his-September 2013 missed exam cycle. The Board, consisting ¢ ny reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 December 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8230 14

    Original file (NR8230 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant te the provisions of reference {a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to shew that Petitionsr advanced to E-4/AWS3 via the Advanced Technical Field program. reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 November 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4748-13

    Original file (NR4748-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she was advanced to E-4/HT3 from the March 2011 Navy-wide advancement exam cycle. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 September 2013, and, pursuant to its reguiations, determined that the partial corrective action indicated below...